On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > not. They *sometimes* use interfaces in the implementation, but not always. > At no point should one assume that because a type supports a protocol it > 'isA' that protocol (or its interface). >
That's very interesting. From a performance point of view, is there a penalty involved in being in a case where the implementation does not use interfaces? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
