On Aug 3, 4:40 pm, Brian Hurt <bhur...@gmail.com> wrote: > So the real answer is: this isn't a good use for seqs.
I was afraid that was the case. Too bad, 'cause seqs are otherwise elegant. Thanks for the sanity check. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
