I can move creating a binary distribution to the to top of the list. I could use some guidance from the interested on what would serve the purpose on this and other things mentioned here.
on the distribution: Do you want just a zip of of DLLs? An installer? Do you want installation to the GAC? on 'stable, dependable': Is there any strategy on creating new releases that makes sense? Assume anyone wanting to stay on the bleeding edge will build for themselves? start-up speed: I'm running some experiments on that. The problem is mostly the monolithic nature of the assemblies created and the amount of environment initialization. Suggestions welcomed. Ease of embeddability: please elaborate on the problems. AOT'ing clj files: Ditto. -David On Aug 3, 12:47 pm, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really wish that ClojureCLR had a binary distribution. I like > > clojure a lot but I have a .Net background and a lot of .Net code to > > interact with. If ClojureCLR had a stable, dependable binary > > distribution I would be able to use it at work much more than I > > already do. I don't care much about 1.2 features like defrecord. What > > I care about is start-up speed, ease of embeddability, and Visual > > Studio integration (not Intellisense, just AOT'ing .clj files). > > +1 for all of that > > That paragraph basically explains why I haven't started using clojure > at my work yet. > > Timothy Baldridge -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
