They are separated: in the HTML version ("html-content" JSON property), code is wrapped in <pre class="code">, results in <pre class="output">, and verbiage in <p>. For the Markdown version ("raw- content"), there are plain-text delineations.
I will change the mime-type, though... Justin On Jul 8, 1:31 pm, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > That's nifty. Suggestion though: if you really want to have tools > pull those examples so that they could be used systematically, the > json should really be structured to clearly separate code, expected > results, and verbiage -- linebreaks aren't enough, as I could imagine > many functions having a *lot* of examples, and just popping up a chunk > of scrolling text may or may not be what a typical IDE user would find > useful. > > - Chas > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Justin Kramer wrote: > > > > > One use case I was thinking of for the Wiki is that IDEs could make > > API requests for individual functions on-the-fly, or do a mass export > > periodically. A basic version of the former exists now: > > >http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/clojure.core/conj?format=json > > > The result could be displayed plain text or as HTML in a popup/ > > overlay/ > > etc. > > > One could even pull the examples from the Wiki and attach them to > > metadata via John's set-examples!. This could be done by a function > > that's only called when in REPL mode (similar to 'source' etc.). > > > Or it could follow the approach of the 'javadoc' function: open your > > browser to a page with detailed examples. > > > Just some ideas, > > > Justin > > > On Jul 8, 11:38 am, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > >> I think there's a lot of value to having good documentation and > >> examples available directly in your development environment. I'm not > >> sure what a reasonable alternative would be for that context other > >> than having the examples and docs included (or at least, adjacent, as > >> set-examples! allows for). It certainly seems reasonable to ensure > >> that such information is not included in whatever distribution of > >> clojure you would "ship" (whatever that means in your context). > > >> The details are sticky though, and would involve touching processes > >> that aren't the most forgiving AFAICT (i.e. the core clojure build > >> and > >> surrounds). > > >> - Chas > > >> On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Moritz Ulrich wrote: > > >>> I don't think examples should be integrated in the > >>> function-definition. It's *way* to much bloat. > > >>> I like the wayhttp://clojure-examples.appspot.com/clojure.coregoes. > >>> A wiki-like documentation for examples, linked to every > >>> clojure-namespace. These examples could be serialized into some data > >>> structure and integrated in clojure.jar. This would result in no > >>> bloat > >>> for core.clj etc. and nice, accessible examples for our > >>> development-tools. > > >>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:05 PM, John Cromartie > >>> <jcromar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> I've whipped up a proof-of-concept of how to implement built-in > >>>> examples for functions and macros. The general idea is to add an > >>>> attribute to the var that contains a list of docstrings and arg > >>>> lists > >>>> or code that illustrate common usage. > > >>>> Let me know what you think:http://gist.github.com/466743 > > >>>> It could also be useful for generating documentation. > > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups "Clojure" group. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > >>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > >>>> with your first post. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > >>> -- > >>> Moritz Ulrich > >>> Programmer, Student, Almost normal Guy > > >>>http://www.google.com/profiles/ulrich.moritz > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "Clojure" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > >>> with your first post. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > > with your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en