Hi, On Jul 8, 1:52 pm, Moritz Ulrich <ulrich.mor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> No offense, but I don't really like the way the project > athttp://getclojure.org:8080/examples/does it. The examples doesn't > help, as they are no explanations, the results aren't shown and many > of them are overly complicated. Yes. They show the result, when clicking on the example. But without explanation. Here is a more detailed answer on what problems I see with getclojure as it stands at the moment: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/b52e4c790129d0b1 The fact that it scans the IRC logs explains quite a lot. For example, why (. "a" concat "b") is included as an example for concat. I don't think that this is a viable approach. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
