On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:51:06 +0200
Peter Schuller <peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote:

> > Is anyone using anything more sophisticated than clojure.core/time for
> > benchmarking clojure code?
> 
> No, but last time I thought about this I figured a very simple
> (benchmark ...) would simply:
> 
> * Iterate with exponentially higher repeat counts until total runtime
> reaches >= 1 second (say).
> * Then, iterate with the same count until the timing over some period,
> say 10 seconds, has a sufficiently low standard deviation.
> * Then, take that repeat count and re-run enough to reach, say, 10
> seconds, of time.
> 
> Obviously the 1, 10 and std dev thesholds would be selectable, with
> some default. So that in the normal case for micro-benchmarking, you'd
> just do:
> 
>    (benchmark (run-my-stuff))
> 
> And it would usually "just work" even if run-my-stuff is a trivial
> function that completes really really quickly (due to the exponential
> growth).
> 
> Thoughts? It's obviously not meant for really serious benchmarking,
> but I think it would be a good thing to have in cases where one might
> now otherwise use (time ..).

This is pretty much where I was heading when I started writing those
two macros. Wanting to be able to time very short runtimes without
timing the loop, I wrote loop-timer to deal with loop overhead. Only
to have it return negative values in the process of trying to get a
reasonable total run time. This makes that process, um, interesting.

       <mike
-- 
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org>             http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.

O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to