won't someone please think of the children? On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Brian Goslinga <quickbasicg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 30, 12:50 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, cageface <milese...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I don't know what the implementation plans are exactly for clojure-in- >> > clojure but abandoning the JVM would be extremely unwise. >> >> Clojure-in-Clojure isn't about abandoning the JVM. It's about implementing >> more of Clojure in itself. This has several benefits, *one* of which is >> making it easier to port Clojure to other platforms. >> >> For example, I would love to see some portion of Clojure run on a platform >> that has much faster boot times so I can use Clojure for one-off shell >> scripts. >> >> David > For the time being, you could use nailgun. My clj script uses nailgun > and for a warm start I can run clj -e "(System/exit 0)" in 20 > milliseconds. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
