On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jeff Rose <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't use records or protocols or structs or metadata or > anything fancy, just regular old maps. For modeling sequential data, > like DNA base pairs, use vectors. Then create a series of functions > to read these things in, write them out, and perform some different > transformations. Don't worry so much about where or how in memory you > are going to "store" stuff. Just write a library of functions that > can read, write and manipulate your objects of interest. That's > pretty much a functional library, and you'll surprise yourself how > much can be done in this way. > +1 if you make the function not just for vector but for any seqs. That way of we need special BioSeqs someday... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
