On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Rob Lachlan <robertlach...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The clojure way seems to be to do as much as possible with functions > on raw (immutable) data, rather than building up object systems. The > sequence is already one of clojure's primary abstractions, and it may > not always *need* to wrapped in something like defrecord. (Though for > some applications, I'm sure it will.) > I agree. One totally different approach to OO would be to use Seq as much as possible and add informations about them in meta. There is also room for purely functional OO-style with records and a few protocols when needed... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
