On 29 June 2010 02:26, cageface <milese...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stuart's book is a big help here but I'm afraid that Clojure is simply over > the heads of a lot of "noobs" anyway. >
Ah. The Clojure community has already started down the road to Common Lisp-style, smugness-generated obscurity and disdain. Bravo! Well-played! Just a little suggestion: instead of thinking of Clojure users as elites who are "over the heads" of "n00bs", perhaps you can figure out a way to get the "n00bs" to join the self-proclaimed elite. I mean really, if the elites are even *half* as intelligent as they claim to be, surely they can tackle this human relations problem with the same zeal and formidable intellect that they apply to software-related problems. Or is this too difficult? -- "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions of entering China our focus has really been what's best for the Chinese people. It's not been about our revenue or profit or whatnot." --Sergey Brin, demonstrating the emptiness of the "don't be evil" mantra. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
