On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT) cageface <milese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 12:04 pm, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups. > 620...@mired.org> wrote: > > The Python approach leads to more readable > > code:http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/papers/readability.html > > You don't seem to be very sympathetic to the Lisp way of doing things. Not true as I understand "the Lisp way". You also need to reread the last paragraph again. > What's your interest in Clojure? It's LISP with a richer set of data structures, and (via it's integration with the JVM) without the problems I had with LISP systems last time I worked with them. It's also got more interesting tools for dealing with concurrency than any other language I'm familiar with. Lately, it seems like the JVM integration comes with more problems than it solves, and makes me wonder about building Clojure with gjc. <mike -- Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
