I'd like to resurrect this thread, because I have the exact same
requirement Laurent had and I'm hoping there's been some additional
progress in this area.

I'm set to give a Clojure presentation to our company's Java
developers, and I'm looking for a way to excite the audience about FP
concepts in general and Clojure in particular.

This audience will only care about one thing: how does this improve
productivity / help do our job better?

Thoughts? What convinced you?



On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the "food for thought". I'm concerned with the short
> introduction not being too much "goal oriented" (and more "tutorial
> oriented"), I'll continue think about it in "background mode".
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Laurent
>
> 2010/4/23 cburroughs <chris.burrou...@gmail.com>:
>> What I did when I needed to give a shorter talk was to base it on some
>> of the well known presentations and just cut out a lot. I don't think
>> Stuart's intro or Rich's "for Java people" talk assumes people are
>> already enthusiastic about functional programming.
>>
>> [1] http://github.com/stuarthalloway/clojure-presentations/ or those
>> attached to the file section
>>
>> On Apr 21, 8:14 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've consulted a lot of already made presentations of clojure.
>>> They are great, but I guess they may not suit my needs because it
>>> seems to me that either:
>>>   * they are more 1 1/2 to 2 hours talks than 45 minutes
>>>   * they assume the "public" will not be relunctant to some terms like
>>> "Lisp", "Functional Programming" and directly present these as
>>> advantages
>>>
>>> My goal is to raise interest into clojure in the mind of a public of
>>> people having used java for a long time. They may have Scala already
>>> in their "radar", but not clojure, or may have seen it and immediately
>>> dismissed it for what seemed to them good reasons (mainly aversion for
>>> lisp syntax), though we all know this is not true after the "normal"
>>> adaptation period.
>>>
>>> Say this presentation could be the presentation that leads people, at
>>> its end, asking you for giving all those great other presentations
>>> already available that I mentioned before ...
>>>
>>> Any references I missed that already solve my problem ? :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to