On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:43:36 -0400
David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Mike Meyer <
> mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Were those real world programs, or arithmetic benchmarks? Most real world
> > programs I see spend so little of their time doing arithmetic that making
> > the math an order of magnitude slower wouldn't make a noticeable difference
> > in overall runtime.
> >
>
> "Most real world programs". You mean like Clojure itself?
>
> Please look over the implementation of gvec before making statements like
> this:
This is actually the what I'm trying to figure out. While *my* code
may have no explicit arithmetic in it, it's not clear without diving
into the guts of clojure how much arithmetic gets done in it's name by
things like gvec.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
