Probably, but I'm at a loss to figure out exactly what it might be.  I
cleaned emacs off, along with the .emacs.d directory, reinstalled, and
the problem reappeared. I'm not touching it right now since, as I
mentioned, I managed too bootstrap using aquamacs.


On Jun 13, 12:42 am, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
<tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net> wrote:
> Weird - I installed the Cocoa build last night, and got everything set
> up via elpa including swank-clojure. Some local problem?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Rob Lachlan <robertlach...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree that the cocoa builds are the nicest.  But there is one
> > problem that I've had with them: I wasn't able to successfully install
> > swank-clojure through elpa from within that emacs.  Curiously, I was
> > able to install it through elpa in aquamacs, and then I had no problem
> > using swank-clojure from within the cocoa (emacsforosx.com) emacs.
>
> > I'm at a loss to account for this, and I don't have the emacs-fu to
> > debug this.
>
> > All that aside, yeah the cocoa (emacsforosx.com) builds are very nice,
> > minimalist and very functional.
>
> > On Jun 12, 3:31 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
>
> >> <tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net> wrote:
> >> > What are the major differences in the different distributions,
> >> > particularly for Clojure development?
>
> >> > I've got everything (Slime, Paredit, Clojure-mode etc) set up in
> >> > Carbon emacs and it works great, just curious if there are any
> >> > substantials gains to be had in Aquamacs or other alternative
> >> > distributions. :)
>
> >> Carbon Emacs is pretty outdated; it's based on Emacs 22. (c. 2007)
> >> Aquamacs messes up a lot of the defaults and isn't portable, so most
> >> elisp library authors can't test on it or help you debug problems
> >> you're having with it. I recommend the Cocoa build of GNU 
> >> Emacs:http://emacsformacosx.comhasprebuilt binaries.
>
> >> -Phil
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to