Probably, but I'm at a loss to figure out exactly what it might be. I cleaned emacs off, along with the .emacs.d directory, reinstalled, and the problem reappeared. I'm not touching it right now since, as I mentioned, I managed too bootstrap using aquamacs.
On Jun 13, 12:42 am, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson <tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net> wrote: > Weird - I installed the Cocoa build last night, and got everything set > up via elpa including swank-clojure. Some local problem? > > Regards, > Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson > > > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Rob Lachlan <robertlach...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree that the cocoa builds are the nicest. But there is one > > problem that I've had with them: I wasn't able to successfully install > > swank-clojure through elpa from within that emacs. Curiously, I was > > able to install it through elpa in aquamacs, and then I had no problem > > using swank-clojure from within the cocoa (emacsforosx.com) emacs. > > > I'm at a loss to account for this, and I don't have the emacs-fu to > > debug this. > > > All that aside, yeah the cocoa (emacsforosx.com) builds are very nice, > > minimalist and very functional. > > > On Jun 12, 3:31 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson > > >> <tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net> wrote: > >> > What are the major differences in the different distributions, > >> > particularly for Clojure development? > > >> > I've got everything (Slime, Paredit, Clojure-mode etc) set up in > >> > Carbon emacs and it works great, just curious if there are any > >> > substantials gains to be had in Aquamacs or other alternative > >> > distributions. :) > > >> Carbon Emacs is pretty outdated; it's based on Emacs 22. (c. 2007) > >> Aquamacs messes up a lot of the defaults and isn't portable, so most > >> elisp library authors can't test on it or help you debug problems > >> you're having with it. I recommend the Cocoa build of GNU > >> Emacs:http://emacsformacosx.comhasprebuilt binaries. > > >> -Phil > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en