I prefer the native Emacs.app compiled from source. Aquamacs integrates nice, but it changes many emacs keybinding per-default and makes it hard to change them, which is a no-go for me. Also, if you have a nicely-configurated Emacs.app instance running, you can switch easily to other "standard" emacs versions, which you can't so easily with Aquamacs.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson <tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net> wrote: > What are the major differences in the different distributions, > particularly for Clojure development? > > I've got everything (Slime, Paredit, Clojure-mode etc) set up in > Carbon emacs and it works great, just curious if there are any > substantials gains to be had in Aquamacs or other alternative > distributions. :) > > > Regards, > Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson > http://kjeldahlnilsson.net > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Moritz Ulrich Programmer, Student, Almost normal Guy http://www.google.com/profiles/ulrich.moritz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
