On 12 Jun 2010, at 16:18, Russell Christopher wrote: > You're right. Hope I haven't offended with the fail, I thought I had tested > it - by iterating over a range and comparing it to Uncle Bob's but obviously > I didn't do that right and then realized that factorization is likely not > O(n) anyway. I'll probably take more time next time.
No offense was caused. I thought I'd tinker with the code, aiming to replace the :n & :fs with destructuring, and then got distracted by the pedantic matter of correctness. :-) -Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
