On 30 May 2010 12:42, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, what's wrong with this: > > for (k = 0; k < 256; ++k) > writeBuffer(k % 16, k / 16, value[k]); > > :)
I was about to say the same thing. Clojure can be more concise than most other languages, but in this case, all one needs is a simple loop, modulus and quotient operations; and all languages have at least that :) - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
