Stu Halloway, I used the reasoning from your thread to convince Stuart Sierra to switch argument order between str-utils2 & str-utils3:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/browse_thread/thread/7ab69b1d43012917 Args go last. Sean On May 27, 3:16 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You also mention making the string argument first in some of these > > fns. I believe Will Smith's catch phrase says it best: "Aw hell > > no". String fns are like any other seq fn, and they need to be > > partial'ed, comp'ed and chained appropriately. I can't even begin to > > count the number of point free string processing routines I have. > > Will Smith rarely loses out, especially in summer blockbuster season, but you > and he are going to be disappointed on this one. String functions will take > strings first, per e.g. > > [1]http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/8b2c8dc96b39... > > Stu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
