> You also mention making the string argument first in some of these
> fns.  I believe Will Smith's catch phrase says it best:  "Aw hell
> no".  String fns are like any other seq fn, and they need to be
> partial'ed, comp'ed and chained appropriately.  I can't even begin to
> count the number of point free string processing routines I have.

Will Smith rarely loses out, especially in summer blockbuster season, but you 
and he are going to be disappointed on this one. String functions will take 
strings first, per e.g.

[1] 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/8b2c8dc96b39ddd7/3a2b131c225677d7

Stu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to