> You also mention making the string argument first in some of these > fns. I believe Will Smith's catch phrase says it best: "Aw hell > no". String fns are like any other seq fn, and they need to be > partial'ed, comp'ed and chained appropriately. I can't even begin to > count the number of point free string processing routines I have.
Will Smith rarely loses out, especially in summer blockbuster season, but you and he are going to be disappointed on this one. String functions will take strings first, per e.g. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/8b2c8dc96b39ddd7/3a2b131c225677d7 Stu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en