On May 18, 2010, at 23:08 , Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, ... > It's always a good idea to use things we already have: ... > (get (get-in m (butlast ks)) (last ks) not-found)))
Hmm this is slowish, you walk ks twice that way, i think the if-let way is better, performance wise. Not sure if it really matters but for really nested maps this might make a difference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
