Hi, On May 17, 9:34 pm, braver <delivera...@gmail.com> wrote: > If get-in is to be consistent with get, it better allow to specify a > default value: > > (get-in nested-structure [k1 k2 ... kN] :default something) > > -- would it make sense to add that to the standard get-in?
while I certainly agree from the users point of view, as an implementer, I'd hate to break the very nice implementation of get- in. One would have to change reduce first. ;-) Cheers, stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
