On May 18, 2:23 am, Base <basselh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (defn lazy-date-seq [d1 d2] > (let [start (-> d1 > (.dayOfMonth) > (.withMinimumValue))] > (lazy-seq > (cons start > (if (joda/before? start d2) > (lazy-date-seq (.plusMonths start 1) d2)))))) > > The lazy version worked like a champ and appears (to me) to be more in > the vain of Lisp (with a touch of Haskell). > Is the author of the blog correct about using lazy seq in this way? > Assuming that he is correct and I converted date-seq to a loop/recur > format to use TCO, would one of these be preferable over the other in > terms of idiomatic clojure? The lazy version is more idiomatic. By default, you should make sequences lazy unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise. In this case it also avoids the stack building problem that the recursive version has. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
