Hi, On 29 Apr., 14:10, Stuart Halloway <[email protected]> wrote: > "In theory, you may be right about 'contains?.' In practice, Rich > Hickey is right." - Stu Halloway. :-)
probably a little off-topic, but to me the most irritating thing about contains? is, that it just returns nil (RT/F, that is) for lists. The implementation is full of special cases (Associative, IPersistentSet, Map, String, Array), but choses to ignore lists. Cheers, :ska -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
