On Apr 29, 9:57 am, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed: Rich's explanation is the more important bit. > > My point is that we may be wasting time arguing about something that > nobody actually does. If idiomatic usage changes as the community > grows, we *could* add a collection-generic contains.
I think 'nobody' isn't valid here. The small handful of experts who are crafting contrib is not representable of the Clojure community. I think that's what Antony meant by 'you're sampling a very small codebase'. I humbly submit to you that perhaps you know Clojure too well. You'd never get confused by this and can't see how anyone else would? Cheers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
