Maybe juste the name ? wouldn't with-open-close be a better reminder of how the bindings are constructed ?
2010/4/29 Alex Osborne <a...@meshy.org>: > ka <sancha...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Above I wrote a macro with-open-flexi! ... which I'm planning to use >> in my app's API . .. please let me know if there are any bugs / >> gotchas / improvements etc... >> >> I didn't get any responses, so does it means there is something so >> obviously wrong that you can't even begin where to start :) (I doubt >> so) or does it looks OK ..? > > It looks okay to me, nothing obviously stands out as wrong with it. :-) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
