When it comes to naming factory functions—functions that create things—
clojure.core gives four precedents:

1. Name it exactly what the new object is called. vector, hash-map,
set.
2. Name it a shortened version of #1. vec.
3. Prefix #1 with "make-". make-hierarchy, make-array.
4. Prefix #1 with "create-". create-ns, create-struct.

Are there any guidelines for naming a library's own factory functions?

(I find #1 and #2 pretty annoying, since they interfere with my
binding of symbols in let forms, but between #3 and #4 I'm not sure.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to