On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Per Vognsen wrote: > Is there any reason why a .method occurrence in non-operator position > doesn't just do the closure wrapping automagically?
I'd like to know this as well. Smooth Java interop is one of Clojure's selling points, but having to wrap Java methods in lambdas to use them as first-class functions feels awkward. Especially if the method in question has multiple arguments! -Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
