memfn is from the depths of time and should be deprecated -- it is
idiomatic to write an anonymous fn around the method.
Stu
This seems like a potential usecase for (memfn):
-------------------------
clojure.core/memfn
([name & args])
Macro
Expands into code that creates a fn that expects to be passed an
object and any args and calls the named instance method on the
object passing the args. Use when you want to treat a Java method as
a first-class fn.
user> (= (map (memfn getName) (-> (Runtime/
getRuntime) .getClass .getMethods seq))
(map #(.getName %) (-> (Runtime/
getRuntime) .getClass .getMethods seq)))
true
On Mar 18, 6:21 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
Hi,
Java methods are not clojure functions. To treat them like first-
class
functions you have to wrap them in clojure functions as you did in
your second example.
For your actual task: you might want to look at clojure.contrib.repl-
utils/show.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
