Wait... what's the problem we're trying to solve? On Feb 18, 1:56 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:44:52AM -0800, Rowdy Rednose wrote: > > Yeah, the numbers depend a bit on the data, so distinct will look > > better if there are many dupes, and running tests against > > > (mapcat vector (range 500000) (range 500000)) > > > so we have 50% dupes, gave me these numbers: > > You have to sort the collections with your unique. This is not counted > in the current benchmark. > > Any reason why not to use (concat (range ..) (range ..))? ;) > > Sincerely > Meikel
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
