Hi, On Feb 18, 4:34 pm, Rowdy Rednose <rowdy.redn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> better-unique is not too far off from my initial approach, but still, > why no side effects? Here an example, where side-effects are the gotcha: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/d8fe58489e913433 (filter #(mod % (rand-int 10)) (range 100)) I think side-effects should be read as in transients: if no one sees the side effect, is there one? "Your" side-effect is local to your predicate. However the side-effect in rand-int is not! Maybe as a rule of thumb? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
