> > 2) c.c.sql shouldn't assume that we want anything printed at all?! > > Just throw the SQLException. > > Printing to *err* is acceptable IMO. This is the common "should my > library write log messages, and if so how?" problem. I'd rather have > it print to *err* than use Java Logging. >
Why log anything at all? The relevant information is (or can be) stored in the exception. I don't want to see clojure contrib embrace the catch/log/re-throw idiom. I couldn't find any other code in contrib that follows this approach. Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
