On 9 Feb 2010, at 22:29, aria42 wrote:
If this situation is common enough, shouldn't defprotocol support optional implementations which are implicitly merged?
Yes, if it is common enough. It's perhaps too early to decide. Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
