That's a great point. A contains? should be used in that case.
On Jan 29, 2:14 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.01.2010 um 03:49 schrieb Sean Devlin:
>
> > I'd do one thing differently than Tim. (partial = something) is a
> > clojure smell. It's more idiomatic to use a set
>
> > (if (some #{"foo"} ["foo" "bar"]) "yay" "humbug")
>
> This will fail if the collection is allowed to contain nil or false.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
