On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So you just need to instead use (new Trec (+ 1 v)).
>
> thanks! that does work for me, too.
>
> (i'm hoping Clojure will be able to avoid having to do it that way in
> the long run.)
>

That's as designed, and documented.

Rich

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to