On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So you just need to instead use (new Trec (+ 1 v)). > > thanks! that does work for me, too. > > (i'm hoping Clojure will be able to avoid having to do it that way in > the long run.) >
That's as designed, and documented. Rich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
