On Jan 25, 7:20 pm, Roman Roelofsen <roman.roelof...@googlemail.com> wrote: > After playing around with clojureql I noticed how well the relational > data model maps to a functional language. Processing lists (result > sets), joining, filter, group by, etc. are ideas I found in both > worlds. I am currently working on a toy project where I "declared" the > relational model as my dominant way to express data, persistent as > well as in-memory. So far I can say that it is working seamlessly. > Everything feels natural. The relational model is very well understood > and it was quite easy for me think in this model during coding as > well. Also, I was quite happy that I did not need to work with deep > hierarchies, etc. in a dynamic language anymore. Using the relational > model also gave me the SQL-DDL as an expressive way to define my data > schemes, types, etc.
Do you plan on setting this up somewhere? I'd be very interested to see this, but it does not seem to be amongst your github-stuff. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
