On Jan 24, 5:05 pm, joel r <cirqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's meant to be called like this:
> (define-template some-template-name
> page some-function-1
> posts some-function-2
> post some-function-3)
>
> It defs a var called some-template-name bound to a map that looks like this:
> {:page some-function-1
> :posts some-function-2
> :post some-function-3}
Then perhaps:
(defmacro define-template [name & args]
`(def ~name
(hash-map ~@(mapcat (fn [[k v]] [(keyword k) v]) args)))
But honestly, I'm not sure I see the point. The macro doesn't make the
code particularly more concise, and the code is less clear now it uses
a custom macro, rather than using a standard hash-map.
I'd personally favour this:
(def foobar
{:page some-function-1
:posts some-function-2
:post some-function-3})
Over this:
(define-template foobar
page some-function-1
posts some-function-2
post some-function-3)
The former is a lot clearer to read, as it uses standard Clojure
datastructures.
- James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
