Hi,
I was wondering whether there was an elegant way to make this macro do
more work:
(defmacro define-template [template-name & template-params]
`(def ~template-name (apply merge (map (fn [[k# v#]]
{(keyword k#) (var-get
(resolve v#))})
(partition 2 2 '~template-params)))))
It's meant to be called like this:
(define-template some-template-name
page some-function-1
posts some-function-2
post some-function-3)
It defs a var called some-template-name bound to a map that looks like this:
{:page some-function-1
:posts some-function-2
:post some-function-3}
But I'm not sure I've written the macro as well as it could be done,
no doubt due my own ignorance. The mapping function call that the
macro emits will do quite a bit of work to create the map that I want.
I was thinking maybe there's more work that the macro can do during
the macro expansion phase.
If you need more context, please have a look at this code:
http://github.com/finalprefix/blog-in-15-minutes/blob/master/test/tests.clj
It's basically toy project to get to know clojure/macros/emacs/compojure better.
Thanks in advance for you thoughts!
Joel Rosario.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
