On Jan 22, 1:30 pm, samppi <rbysam...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is not a big deal: it is a quibble with a weird and inconvenient > behavior of list*: when given an empty sequence, it returns nil > instead of the empty list. Why is this? According to list*'s > documentation, list* should always return a list.
Judging from the code for list*, as well as its usage in apply, I infer the return value is supposed to adhere to seq semantics. What issue were you having such that returning a nil (as opposed to an empty list) was a problem? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
