> how is that not an argument? I'm pretty sure I just used it as one.
What I wanted to say is that you are completely right, if you say that it is easy to create a workaround. But although doing this is easy, this does not mean that we should not fix this inconsistency (or do you see none?) anyway.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
