> > I guess it's mostly a matter of judging a language by its long-term > merits instead of initial appearance -- just like with so many other > things in life. >
That - right there - is a tacit admission that the Clojure community will find it actively desirable that it remain a minority language, so we can all feel smug that we understand something those poor average programmers were too simple to see. You know there's nothing wrong with allowing Clojure to display its elegance upfront, rather than making programmers work for it like it's some Presbytarian admission exam. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
