> I'm fully aware that my argumentation would carry much more weight if > I had the opportunity to contribute some code for migrations, but I > currently don't have :(
Your argument lacks no weight. You make a good case for migrations so I'll look into it, and I'll be very happy to write up the first implementation myself. I think we might end up in a situation though, where I want to freeze ClojureQL as version 1.0 as soon as we have a completely stable core which is usable in projects both large and small. In that setting, migrations look more like 1.1 material to me. Nothing is decided though and I am looking into it. /Lau B. Jensen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
