> > It's really been a time saver and I think it's a really good fit with > ClojureQL. > > Raphaël
Raphaél, thank you for bringing this to my attention, it looks interesting. I think this falls more in the tool-category than the language- category. In its simplest form ClojureQL aims to make you totally DB- Agnostic, adhering only to its own syntax and then totally disregarding the target DBMS. I hope that it will be picked up for further high-level abstractions ala clj-record or similar. These tools can easily be built on top of ClojureQL, but I'm not sure that they should be knitted into ClojureQL. I'm open for discussion though. /Lau B. Jensen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
