> On Nov 23, 5:00 pm, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > i'd be interested to hear who has successfully used clojure in > > production. i know of some, as some folks have been vocal; any other > > interesting-but-so-far-silent uses people'd be willing to fess up > > about?
http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/01/clojure_production The bus has been up for months now and down times have been related to either some hardware changes (system is fully redundant so most of the time no downtime occurred) and network stability issues over which we have little control (managed by the customer's IT group). We are adding more functions tapping on the information flowing on the bus, of course these are now written in Clojure... Census tracking, decentralized service request management, ... This year the bus will also extend to interconnect other hospital services. The bus is also a way to convince users to move to a paperless environment and focus on data entry completeness to achieve that goal. We have also in the works a Clojure/Terracotta/Java messaging layer to improve parallelism. This should be rolled out in summer time. Transitioning to Clojure V1.0 was not a problem and we do not expect that moving 1.1 will prove difficult. The bus is still running on a cluster of small foot print computers but we moved to Atom 330 motherboards to boost processing power. This thing will celebrate it's first year in production very soon without significant pain and this a proof to me that Clojure is mature. Luc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
