Regarding Clojure sequence functions: why couldn't they have the
option of returning non-lazy seqs? Because you don't always really
need lazy seqs. It might be nice to have the option.
(map (fn[x] x) [1 2 3] :strict) -> [1 2 3]
or even
(binding [*strict* true]
(map (fn[x] x) [1 2 3]))
-> [1 2 3]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
