I sympathize with your difficulties, but isn't there something fundamentally incompatible between the later-or-never of lazy-seq and the this-way-here-and-now for which dynamic binding is good for? In this case you picked laziness over code simplification, maybe it'll be the other way around some times. I'm not sure if both features belong together.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
