Well, I care (conceptually) more about the fix being made, rather than the exact timeframe. If we had to wait until clojure-in-clojure, I think I could live with that, since the issue can be readily avoided. We'll see if Rich has a chance to chime-in to acknowledge whether or not he considers this a bug.
On Nov 4, 5:47 am, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Paul Mooser <taron...@gmail.com> wrote: > The real solution would be pervasive locals clearing but I seem to > remember Rich saying he'd like to delay such work until clojure in > clojure. > > > What's the procedure for creating a ticket for this? Is it at least > > acknowledged that this IS a bug? > > It's better to wait for Rich's opinion on this problem before creating a > ticket. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
