I notice that certain sequence operations such as concat and cons will not retain the original type of sequence, for example if you combine two vectors together a list will be returned:
user=> (concat [1 2] [3 4]) (1 2 3 4) is this intentional behavior, and would it not be more consistent for concat to retain the original type of the data structures, when both data structures that were passed in are of the same type. Also, why does cons behave differently from conj: user=> (conj [1 2] 3) [1 2 3] user=> (cons 2 [1 2]) (2 1 2) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
