It would be kind of nice to have some sort of uniform identifier for laziness similar to ! for destructive and ? for predicate.
On Sep 18, 5:10 pm, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Runs (in a nice constant memory) even though yours (which almost > > appears equivalent) will not! > > i am thinking ever more that less than stupendously overt syntax for > laziness is too risky cf. Haskell and Clojure. > > sincerely. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
