On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Howard Lewis Ship<hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow! That's a lot of great research. I'm impressed.
Thanks! > My only concern is that some of the internals *could* change over time > (I see Rich's commit stream) and some indication in the doc > identifying what's design level (won't change) vs. implementation > level (might change) would be useful. That's a very valid concern and that's why I say this near the beginning of the "High Level" section: "My intention is to update this article whenever the Clojure STM implementation changes so it remains an accurate source of information that is easier to digest than simply reading the source code." I expect that we'll see all the STM-related code rewritten in Clojure instead of Java, perhaps within the next year, so I'll have a lot of updating to do. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
