On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Chouser wrote:
> The benefits of #"" producing a real java.util.regex.Pattern > object instead of some Clojury wrapper will decrease as it > becomes more common to write Clojure code that can run on > non-JVM platforms. So although this idea has come up and > then been abandoned several times before, I think it's worth > bringing up again periodically to see what makes sense. Why wouldn't #"" produce whatever the corollary regex object is on each host platform? Tangentially, if I think ahead a couple of 'moves', I'd think that perhaps there's a desire to have clojure code that is thoroughly portable between, say, Java and .NET host platforms. - Chas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
